Incomplete Contracts and Firm Boundaries: New Directions
نویسنده
چکیده
The seminal work by Grossman and Hart (1986 “The Costs and Benefits of Ownership: A Theory of Vertical and Lateral Integration”, 94 Journal of Political Economy 691–19.) made the study of firm boundaries susceptible to formal economic analysis, and illuminated an important role for markets in providing incentives. In this essay, I discuss some new directions that the literature has taken since. As a central challenge, I identify the need to provide a formal theory of the firm in which managerial direction and bureaucratic decision-making play a key role. Merging a number of existing incomplete contracting models, I propose two approaches with very different contracting assumptions. As in transaction cost economics, a central element in those theories is the presence of a central office that directs and coordinates the actions of subordinates. More novel, I highlight the superior ability of nonintegrated firms to adapt to a changing environment. JEL: D23, D83, D86, L22, L23.
منابع مشابه
The Market for Mergers and the Boundaries of the Firm∗
Mergers redraw the boundaries of the firm. In this paper, we relate incomplete contracts to empirical regularities in the market for mergers and acquisitions. We begin by empirically challenging conventional wisdom about mergers and acquisitions: high M/B acquirers typically do not purchase low M/B targets. Instead, mergers typically pair together firms with similar M/B ratios. To show why this...
متن کاملForeign market entry under incomplete contracts
I show in this paper that incomplete contracts affect a firm’s decision about serving foreign customers through exports or local sales from an affiliated plant. When contracts between two agents within a firm are too costly to write, the share of multinational firms may be higher or lower compared to a world without contractual frictions. Incomplete contracts also provide a novel explanation fo...
متن کاملRebuilding Organisational Capabilities
What an organisation does versus what it out-sources to the market is a classic boundaries of the firm question that has previously been dominated by efficiency arguments. However, a knowledge-based view suggests these boundaries are integral to the ability of a firm to deploy existing knowledge stocks efficiently, as well as develop new knowledge through learning that will drive future competi...
متن کاملThe boundaries of firms as information barriers
When contracts are incomplete, the property-rights theory of firms suggests that ownership of physical assets provides better outside options, which in turn strengthen the owner’s incentives to invest in the enterprise. This approach is less suitable for human capital firms such as management consulting that lack physical assets. This article develops an alternative theory for integration that ...
متن کاملProperty Rights , Firm Boundaries , and R & D Inputs
This Article offers an explanation of the role of intellectual property rights (IPRs) in information-intensive vertical supply relationships. In particular, we explore the connection between stronger property rights and the enhanced viability of independent (versus vertically integrated) input supply firms when contracts are incomplete. We start by modeling a tradeoff between two types of infor...
متن کامل